Latest News

Encore: How much do people rely on Social Security?


A reporter asked the other day how dependent people were on Social Security. The query sent me scurrying to find the latest Social Security Administration statistical publication showing the percentage of households relying on Social Security for more than 50% or 90% of their income. 

It turns out that the latest date for that publication was 2017. This didn’t come as a total shock, since the reported calculations were based on the Consumer Population Survey (CPS), and a 2017 study identified serious reporting errors in this survey, particularly for pension and retirement income. To state the obvious, underreporting of other sources of retirement income would overstate the importance of Social Security. 

Read: Many young people shouldn’t save for retirement, says research based on a Nobel Prize–winning theory

Fortunately, a pair of SSA researchers have produced a nice paper comparing the picture based on the CPS with that based on: 1) a survey with better reporting of retirement income (the Health and Retirement Study) and 2) the CPS survey linked to benefit data from SSA and income data from the Internal Revenue Service. 

The bottom line is shown in Table 1. The CPS data suggest that for 52% of individuals Social Security accounted for more than 50% of their family income, for 34% it accounted for more than 75%, and for 26% it’s 90% or more. Using the HRS produces slightly lower numbers.  

Linking the individuals in the CPS with their SSA benefit and IRS tax data produces significantly lower reliance on Social Security. Now only 40% of individuals are in households where 50% or more of family income comes from Social Security, 21% where it accounts for 75% or more, and 14% where it accounts for 90% or more. The main difference between these numbers and the CPS alone is the better measure of retirement income coming from the IRS tax data. 

So, you say, use the survey linked to the administrative data and call it a day. That’s not a perfect solution, however. 

First, to protect personally identifiable information, it is very difficult for those not working for the government to get access to the administrative records from SSA and particularly the IRS. 

Second, all this linking takes a lot of time and work. 

Third, note the data are for 2015, because the process requires interagency cooperation and lengthy disclosure review that inevitably involves delays. 

Finally, as helpful as the SSA paper is, the authors didn’t do everything that I might like. It would be interesting to look at reliance by income level. It would be interesting to look at households rather than individuals. It would be interesting to look at reliance just for retirees so that earnings were no longer a source of income—as well as other things.

The way forward in my view is to improve the reporting of other sources of retirement income (both payments from defined-benefit plans and withdrawals from defined-contribution plans) in the CPS. A redesigned CPS questionnaire was fielded in 2015, and comparisons using a split sample design indicated that the prevalence of retirement income other than Social Security was 50% higher than in the former questionnaire and income was 22% higher. The effort produced real improvement, but the recent SSA study shows that a lot of work still needs to be done. 

Let’s do it. We all need good data. 

Rex Nutting: Leading indicators show inflation is slowing, but Fed policy makers are too busy looking in rearview mirror to notice

Previous article

Market Extra: British bond market turmoil is sign of sickness growing in markets, says leading strategist

Next article

You may also like


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Latest News